<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>foambook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foambook.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foambook.com</link>
	<description>the resource for the spray foam community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Spray Foam and 2009 IRC codes? Your interpretation?</title>
		<link>http://www.foambook.com/qa/2012/05/08/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.foambook.com/qa/2012/05/08/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://8.354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.foambook.com">foambook</a> -- <a href="http://www.foambook.com">foambook - the resource for the spray foam community</a></p><p><p>We are looking at spray foam and whether we will be able to use it without an ignition barrier in crawlspaces or attics. The initial opinion is not unless it meets ASTM E 84 with less than 25 flame spread and 450 smoke density. Meaning, only fire retardent foams will be permitted unless you want [...]</p></p><p>readi it now at <a href="http://www.foambook.com/qa/2012/05/08/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation/">Spray Foam and 2009 IRC codes? Your interpretation?</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foambook.com">foambook</a> -- <a href="http://www.foambook.com">foambook - the resource for the spray foam community</a></p><p>We are looking at spray foam and whether we will be able to use it without an ignition barrier in crawlspaces or attics. The initial opinion is not unless it meets ASTM E 84 with less than 25 flame spread and 450 smoke density. Meaning, only fire retardent foams will be permitted unless you want to spend the money on ignition barriers. Have you had any code enforcement officials enforcing this yet? How are you dealing with this issue? Do you use any foam on ductwork in unconditioned spaces. <a href="http://homeenergypros.lbl.gov/forum/topics/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation?xg_source=activity" target="_blank">more</a></p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.foambook.com/qa/2012/05/08/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation/" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foambook.com%2Fqa%2F2012%2F05%2F08%2Fspray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation%2F&amp;title=Spray%20Foam%20and%202009%20IRC%20codes%3F%20Your%20interpretation%3F" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.foambook.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>readi it now at <a href="http://www.foambook.com/qa/2012/05/08/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation/">Spray Foam and 2009 IRC codes? Your interpretation?</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foambook.com/qa/2012/05/08/spray-foam-and-2009-irc-codes-your-interpretation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

